Open Source vs. Closed Source? Which one to choose? [closed]
Posted
by
Rafal Chmiel
on Programmers
See other posts from Programmers
or by Rafal Chmiel
Published on 2011-11-29T21:41:47Z
Indexed on
2011/11/30
2:06 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 568
open-source
|closed-source
So far, I was always creating open-source applications (or didn't publish them at all) because it was free for me to create a new CodePlex project, and upload everything. Couple of days ago I started wandering what kind of apps should I make, closed or open source. I can see "cons" and "pros" in both such as the ones below:
Open Source:
- Pro, free project hosting (CodePlex is excellent for .NET app updates. ClickOnce etc)
- Pro, free help such as developers and designers
- Con, people can get your source code and (sometimes) use some of your code in their apps and make money
- Con, companies such as Microsoft, Twitter or Tumblr won't be looking forward in buying your project (like for example Twitter bought TweetDeck - TweetDeck being a closed source AIR application, of course)
Closed Source:
- Pro, it's harder for people to copy your idea without the source code
- Pro, you're more likely to get acquired/bought by companies
- Con, no free hosting - you have to have a website to do so (not good for updates)
- Con, no free help
What do you think? What do you think I should choose?
© Programmers or respective owner